add new AsciiDocDITA rules - #21
Merged
Merged
Conversation
# Conflicts: # library.json
Member
|
Merged — sorry for the very long silence. I placed the entry in its |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
this PR adds a new AsciiDocDITA rule set to the list of packages. this package attempts to find any AsciiDoc files that will not cleanly transform into DITA-compatible format so that writers can manually update those files for DITA compliance. it checks for things like the following:
and more
we want to enable this for the openshift-docs prow CI so that we can be sure writers are not introducing anything new that would prevent transformation to DITA formatting as they continue to work on content